next up previous contents
Next: CONCLUDING REMARKS AND FUTURE Up: MARM09_REP Previous: MATERIALS AND METHODS   Contents

Subsections


DESCRIPTION OF DEPLOYMENTS AND OF DATA COLLECTED

Initial results are presented, in order to address the importance of the preliminary findings and processing sequence of the data acquired.

OBS AND PIEZOMETER DEPLOYMENT

The OBS were deployed after mapping by multibeam around the proposed sites, in order to identify most suitable areas. The maps in the appendix report the positions for each of them. The proposed sites for piezometers were (a) investigated by CHIRP and multibeam, and by gravity coring. Figure 19 show the CHIRP profiles closer to the deployment sites.

figure

Figure 19: CHIRP profiles relative to the Piezometer's deployment.From left to right, PZ-A, PZ-B, PZ-C, PZ-D, PZ-E.
\begin{figure}\centering
\epsfig{file=IMG/PZ-A_ma09_066.eps,width=0.19\linewidt...
...th}
\epsfig{file=IMG/PZ-E_ma09_188_cut.eps,width=0.19\linewidth}
\end{figure}

SN-4 OBSERVATORY DEPLOYMENT

The deployment of the INGV's SN-4 at the entrance of the Gulf of Izmittook place afternoon of 2009-10-04 after intensive mapping by multibeam and chirp and coring by box-corer and gravity corer (Fig.25). The final destination was chosen to be very close to the NAF, on a flat bottom 165m depth on the center of the steep EW striking valley merging a few hundred m to the W with the Darica Canyon.

After the launch at sea (Fig.20) the SN4 touched down on bottom at 15:56:16 (Fig.21 and 22), a few m of cable were layed out and the system was interrogated by acoustic modems. After several attempts with no response from the station, the cable was released at 16:14:47. Ship moved then away some hundred m and after some retries the SN-4 responded at 18:46:00, providing data of orientation (142 \ensuremath{^\circ}) and of tilt (7-9 \ensuremath{^\circ}well within specification). The day after the area was again investigated by the MEDUSA, and the SN-4 was seen by the TV camera several times around 07:00:00 laying vertical on the bottom (Fig.23 and 24). A further high resolution mapping by multibeam was then performed attempting to find the target on bottom.

figure

Figure 20: SN-4 being deployed.
\begin{figure}\centerline{\epsfig{file=IMG/sn4ridotta.eps,width=0.5\linewidth}}
\end{figure}

figure

Figure 21: Map showing the position of the SN4 on bottom (gray circle and cross). Hollow circle is the ship's reference point position.
\begin{figure}\centerline{\epsfig{file=IMG/SN4-TOUCHDOWN.ps,width=\linewidth}}
\end{figure}

figure

figure

Figure 22: Snapshot of the navigation system's data at the touchdown of SN4.
\begin{figure}\centerline{\epsfig{file=IMG/SN4_TOUCHDOWN.eps,width=\linewidth}}
\end{figure}

Figure 23: Map showing the position of Medusa during the seeing of SN4 on the vertical.
\begin{figure}\centerline{\epsfig{file=IMG/SN4-SEEN-FROM-MEDUSA.ps,width=\linewidth}}
\end{figure}

figure

Figure 24: Snapshot of the navigation system's data of the Medusa on top of SN4.
\begin{figure}\centerline{\epsfig{file=IMG/MEDUSA_SN4_SEEN_0656.eps,width=\linewidth}}
\end{figure}

figure

Figure 25: The area of SN-4 deployment.
\begin{figure}\centerline{\epsfig{file=IMG/MARM09_SN4_ZOOM.eps,width=\linewidth}}
\end{figure}

figure

Figure 26: 3D swath bathymetric map collected after the deployment of station. SN4 is visible (in yellow) at the seafloor.
\begin{figure}\centerline{\epsfig{file=IMG/SN4_3D.eps,width=\linewidth}}
\end{figure}

MEDUSA PROFILING

The MEDUSA towed observatory was launched in the areas of the Darica Canyon, of the Structural High and of the Mud volcanoes to the W of Hersek peninsula, with the aim of obtaining visual information on the bottom morphology and instrumental oceanographical and geochemical data. Figures 27, 28 and 29 shows the runlines in the Darica Canyon, and Hersek Peninsula sites, known to be possible degassing areas. The system was generally towed at very low speed or drifting at 0.5-1.5m above bottom, but in particular cases when it was raised up for sampling water at determined levels.

figure

Figure 27: MEDUSA, Darica Canyon site.
\begin{figure}\centerline{\epsfig{file=IMG/MARM09_MEDUSA_DARICA.eps,width=\linewidth}}
\end{figure}
figure
Figure 28: MEDUSA, Hersek site.
\begin{figure}\centerline{\epsfig{file=IMG/MARM09_MEDUSA_SEEP.eps,width=0.87\linewidth}}
\end{figure}
figure
Figure 29: MEDUSA, Hersek site.
\begin{figure}\centerline{\epsfig{file=IMG/MARM09_MEDUSA_MV.eps,width=0.87\linewidth}}
\end{figure}

SEABED SAMPLING

Tables 13 and 14 show the positioning data and description of samples.

During the First leg 5 gravity corers were taken close to the Piezometer's location on bottom and will be analyzed at IFREMER for geotechnical and sedimentological determinations useful to correlate data of pore pressures time series from the piezometers.

During the Second Leg two box corers, seven gravity cores and four sediment/water interface cores SW-104 [Magagnoli A. and Mengoli M. (1995)] were collected.

The two box corer sampled the area of SN4 near a zone of black patches evidenced by Medusa surveys, aimed also at sampling possible carbonate crusts. The first box corer sampled mud with shell fragments; the second box corer, sampled again mud and also stones, gravel, shell fragments, more compact mud conglomerates, and with black-blue intrusions which were stocked in plastic bags and deep frozen, together with a small core, for possible microbiological investigations. An attempt to measure methane gave negative result. The washed and seived materials showed black to gray sand to gravel granulometries, shell fragments and normal malacofauna (Fig.30).


Table 14: Core sample description. BC=Box corer, SW=Sediment/water.
STATION DATE LENGTH NOTES
MPZ-01 2009-09-27T13:18:01 3.20m PZ-A. Çinarcik  Basin, W.
MPZ-02 2009-09-28T11:09:21 3.24m PZ-B. Çinarcik  Basin, SE. Lacustrine dehydrated very hard overconsolidated mud, tending to inflate. Suggested stratigraphy and correlation with CHIRP, log and X-RAY.
MPZ-03 2009-09-28T14:30:23 2.22m PZ-C. Çinarcik  Basin, SE. Same as MPZ-02
MPZ-04 2009-09-29T06:19:45 2.97m PZ-D, Chirp MA09-176,177. SN4 site, about 100m S of NAF, point of penetration seen on CHIRP, good for correlation. Base of holocene at bottom, overconsolidated sediment
MPZ-05 2009-09-29T14:04:03 3.48m PZ-E. Çinarcik  Basin, NE.
MSN-BC01 2009-10-03T06:22:15 0.18m Box corer. Oxic. mud, shell fragments. Washed and sieved.
MSN-BC02 2009-10-03T07:02:42 0.24m Box corer. Anoxic. sandy mud, shells, shell fragments, stones, pebbles, black instrusions. Core, black sediment in plastic bags, deep freezer.
MSN-C01 2009-10-03T08:57:43 1.00m SN4 site. Extruded, pore waters
MSN-C02 2009-10-03T10:13:11 2.04m SN4 site.
MSN-C03 2009-10-03T11:28:35 2.02m SN4 site.
MSN-SW01 2009-10-06T08:01:09 0.73m SN4 site. Extruded pore waters
MSN-SW02 2009-10-06 08:44:05 0.70m SN4 site.
MSP-C01 2009-10-06T10:08:18 2.24m Mud Volcano, Hersek.
MSP-C02 2009-10-06T11:47:57 1.85m Mud Volcano, Hersek. Large oyster at bottom with other shell fragments.
MEI-C01 2009-10-07T12:22:24 2.73m Humburgaz Basin, very close to NAF.
MEI-SW01 2009-10-07T12:55:30 1.30m Humburgaz Basin, very close to NAF.
MEI-C02 2009-10-07T13:39:20 2.92m Humburgaz Basin, very close to NAF.
MEI-SW02 2009-10-07T14:53:04 0.70m Büyükçekmece, flood


figure

Figure 30: Malacofauna inventory from MBC02, Darica Canyon.
\begin{figure}\centerline{
\epsfig{file=IMG/MBC02_pic1.eps,width=\linewidth}}
\end{figure}

Tree gravity cores (MASN_1, MASN_2, MASN_3) were also collected near the SN4 planned deployment site. The first one was immediately sub-sampled for the pore water extraction (Tab. 15). The pore waters were obtained by a squeezer with extraction capacity of four sample in each cycle for slice thickness from minimum of 2 cm to a maximum of 3 cm. Below the 37-39 cm level the long time required for the extraction and the cleaning face between cycles, did not assure the preservation of sulphides in the sample, therefore the sulphide aliquots were not stocked for the successive slices.On 2009-10-06 two SW-104 (MASNSW01, MASNSW02) were sampled in the SN4 area, and the first one was immediately sub-sampled for the pore water extraction by centrifuge (Tab.16), while the bottom water was preserved in glass vials with butyl stoppers.

Table 17 summarize the aliquots type, the adding solvents and the conservation method.

Core MSNSW02, sampled with PVC liner and stocked at 4, during the recovery lost the bottom water, but the structure of the core was preserved because the sediment (plastic, compact and poorly hydrated) functioned like a stopper.

Successively, on 2009-10-07 (a) two gravity cores were sampled in mud volcano area, near Hersek (MSIP01 and MSIP02), (b) one SW-104 (MEISW01)and two gravity cores in Kumburgaz basin and (c) one SW-104 (Flood01) in the area of the recent flooding deposits in front of Büyükçekmece.

The bottom of core MSIP02 contained a well preserved oyster, 10 cm size (Fig.31).

The cores of second leg have been taken in two copies, and were split between ISMAR and ITU.

figure

Figure 31: Mud Volcano Area, Hersek. Oyster found in the bottom of core..
\begin{figure}\centerline{
\epsfig{file=IMG/SIP02_OYSTER.eps,width=0.65\linewidth}}
\end{figure}


Table 15: Core MSN-C01. Subsampling table. MM=major metals; O= chloride; S= sulfide; TM = trace metals; N= natural; F= sediments;
CM MM O S TM N F NOTE
00-01 X - - - - X Sampled only the aliquot for major metals and trace metals analysis
01-02 X - - - - X  
02-03 X - - - - X  
04-05 X X X X X X  
05-06 X X X X X X  
06-07 X X X X X X  
07-08 X X X X X X  
08-09 X X X X X X  
09-10 X X X X X X  
10-15           X  
15-17 X X X X X X  
17-22           X  
22-24 X X X X X X  
24-29           X  
29-31 X X X X X X  
31-37           X  
37-39 X X X X X X Change 3d section
39-44           X  
44-47 X X X X X X Sediment plastic (less water) the squeezer needed 2 hours for pore water extraction
47-52           X  
52-54 X X X X X X  
54-64           X  
64-67 X X X X X X  
67-77           X  
77-80 X X X X X X  
80-90           X  
90-93 X X X X X X  
93-103           X  
103-106 X X X X X X  
106-129           X  
129-132 X X   X X X The sulphide aliquot was not stocked in the successive sample
132-157           X Change 2nd section
157-160 X X   X X X  
160-185           X  
185-188 X X       X  
188-213           X  
213-216 X X       X  
216-232           X Change section 2nd (bottom plus top of section 1)
232-241           X  
241-244           X No pore water
244-269           X  
269-272           X No pore water
272-297           X  
297-300           X No pore water
300-325           X  
325-328           X No pore water



Table 16: Core MSN-SW01. Subsampling table. MM=major metals; O= chloride; S= sulfide; TM = trace metals; N= natural; F= sediments;
CM MM O S TM N F NOTE
0-0.5 X X X X X X Yellow color with some black intrusion but no sulphide smell
0.5-2.5 X X X X X X  
2.5-4.5 X X X X X X  
4.5-6.5 X X X X X X  
6.5-8.5 X X X X X X  
8.5-10.5 X X X X X X More compact changing sedimentation type and water content
10.5-12.5 X X X X X X  
12.5-14.5 X X X X X X  
14.5-16.5 X X X X X X  
16.5-18.5 X X X X X X  
18.5-20.5 X X X X X X  
20.5-25.5 X X X X X X  
25.5-30.5 X X - X X X  
30.5-35.5 X X - X X X  
35.5-40.5 X X - X X X  
40.5-45.5 X X - X X X Shell fragments
45.5-50.5 X X - X X X  
50.5-60.5 - - - - - X No pore water
60.5-70.5 - - - - - X No pore water
70.5-73.5 - - - - - X No pore water



Table 17: Extrusion of cores. Aliquots type, solvents, conservation.
TYPE SOLVENT RATIO ALIQ/SOLV STOCKED AT
MM Nitric Acid 1:10 +5
TM Nitric Acid 1:10 +5
O - - - 20
N - - - 20
S Zn-acetate 1:7.5 -20
F - - -20"


CHIRP SBP

A quick processing with SEISPRHO [Gasperini and Stanghellini(2009)] was made on board for navigation and geological target selection, other that structural and stratigraphical analysys. Example of the recorded and processed data are shown in Fig.32, 33, 34 and 35.

The data quality ranged from good to very good, with penetration down to 40 m. Two ultra-high resolution closely-spaced grid of profiles were performed in Tuzla, Izmit, Karamürsel  and Gemlik gulfs, to obtain information on NAF offsets and slip rates.

figure

Figure 32: Example of SEISPRHO SEG-Y SBP processed data.
\begin{figure}\centerline{
\epsfig{file=IMG/ma09-302.eps,width=\linewidth}}
\end{figure}

figure

Figure 33: Example of SEISPRHO SEG-Y SBP reprocessed data.
\begin{figure}\centerline{
\epsfig{file=IMG/MA09_103.eps,width=\linewidth}}
\end{figure}

figure

Figure 34: Example of SEISPRHO SEG-Y SBP reprocessed data.
\begin{figure}\centerline{
\epsfig{file=IMG/ma09-317.eps ,width=\linewidth}}
\end{figure}
figure
Figure 35: Example of SEISPRHO SEG-Y SBP reprocessed data.
\begin{figure}\centerline{
\epsfig{file=IMG/ma09-286.eps ,width=\linewidth}}
\end{figure}


next up previous contents
Next: CONCLUDING REMARKS AND FUTURE Up: MARM09_REP Previous: MATERIALS AND METHODS   Contents
2010-04-06